Glassberg
attributes the increase in historical activities to many things. Economic developments have made it
possible for more groups to obtain control of their own histories and therefore
identities. Glassberg also asserts
that many American communities throughout the 20th century have used
historical connections to create economic development. Wallace touts technology, from CD-ROMs
to virtual reality as a primary driver in increased interest in the historical,
and suggests that continued use could indeed amplify this resurgence of
interest.
I
believe new technologies do in fact have some role in this increase, even if
they are not the primary drivers.
From the ease of doing research on the Internet to the entertainment of
historical film and TV, history permeates a great deal of our lives. We can order library books, download
historical documents and in some rare occasions actually search historical
databases, making research fit into even the busiest of schedules. We can even take virtual tours of both
art and history museums, looking at the exhibits as if we were right there in
the building. It is quite possibly
the case that it would truly be a more fulfilling experience to do the research
at the archives, or see the statue or painting in person, but there can be
little doubt that with such ease of access more people will expose themselves
to these things.
Film
and Television are becoming one of the most prominent ways for Americans to
acquire historical knowledge, and some of our favorite documentaries provide
some kind of look at the historical, on channels ranging from PBS, to the
Discovery and History Channels. Heck,
even our science-fiction television is riddled with historical interpretation, in
the form of shows like Dr. Who and Warehouse 13. Technology has even crept into our physically historical
spaces in the form of learning aids at museums, from animatronics at the
Smithsonian to iPads at Carillon Park.
So,
where does this leave public historians in the future of historical presentation? Exactly where we are today, as the
gatekeepers between the academic history of the university and the people who
want to be connected to those histories.
Though many say such ready and easy access to such an incredible array
of historical interpretations on the web there will cease to be a need for us,
but we simply cannot discard the objects of history in order to preserve them
digitally. As we discussed in
class, it is imperative that digitization or not, originals will still have to
be maintained. We will also still
be needed to provide a filter for historical interpretations and maintaining a
foundation of accuracy in what is out there.
No comments:
Post a Comment