I have finally come to the self realization that I am
excited about Lincoln. In case you’ve
been living in a hole for the last couple months there is a new movie coming
out about our 16th President, Abraham Lincoln. No, in this one he
will not be killing vampires. This movie is based around the passage of the 13th
Amendment. Impressively, Stephen Spielberg took ten years making this movie
starring Daniel Day-Lewis as Lincoln.
The
movie, itself, interests me, but what is intriguing me the most right now is
thinking of the implications this movie will have and what kind of reception Lincoln will receive from both the
general public and the history world. What got me thinking about all of this
was reading the article featured in Time
magazine by the renowned historian and noted author of the highly acclaimed
book Team of Rivals, Doris Kearns
Goodwin. I have placed a link to this article below for you to read in all of
your free time, haha.
In this
article Goodwin states, in what to me can be taken as high praise for this
movie and its attention to detail:
I spent 10 years writing Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln- on which Steven Spielberg’s
film Lincoln is partly based- and
every day I imagined Lincoln’s world. I had never seen it realized, however,
until I visited the movie’s set… When production designer Rick Carter opened a
door and led me into his rendering of the Lincoln White House, I felt as if I
had been transported back in time. Every detail was so lovingly created, from
the cubbyholes in Lincoln’s desk to the portrait of Andrew Jackson on the
office wall, from the carpets to the clocks and candelabras.
In Goodwin’s opinion, there was a strong attention to detail
taken this movie. While I can’t say if this is certain, I find it hard to argue
with an expert like Doris Kearns Goodwin. Additionally, it would seem as though
a lot of work has gone into making this movie authentic to the true story it
wishes to portray. Tony Kushner, writer of the screenplay for Lincoln, spent six years researching the
history he was basing the screenplay on. The superb actor Daniel Day-Lewis even
delayed production one year to study Lincoln.
With all this research and
approximately three days until the premier of Lincoln the question begs to be asked, “How will it be received?” Will
the general public flock to it? If so, will that create an avenue for history
to become popular, for at least a little while? What are the historians going
to say? Time will only tell and either it’ll be a joyous celebration of history
done right or it’ll be another instance of a history film going down in flames.
The history community has had a bad
track record for receiving historical films. However, there haven’t been very
many historically accurate films made, but even those that were, at least,
close to authentic were usually shrugged off by historians in both the public
and academic fields. At some times these historians have had good validity to
sucker punch many of these film’s credibility, but at other times it would seem
these historians were just playing the part of old fuddy-duddies. It will be
interesting to see the accuracy that Lincoln
will posses. Whichever way the authenticity pendulum will swing to, it will
be interesting to see the reaction of the historians. If Lincoln does, in fact, prove to be authentic it would be nice to
see the history field embrace it.
I am equally as anxious to see how
the public will react to this movie. There seems to be a lot of hype out there
about it. Had this film been directed by anyone other than Spielberg or the
main actor been any other celebrity than Daniel Day-Lewis I doubt there would
be nearly as much fanfare behind a movie about Abraham Lincoln. As Spielberg
tries to breathe life into our greatest president I wonder if the general
public will find the movie compelling or just pass it off as another boring
history movie and spend the price of admission to see the new James Bond movie,
instead. If this movie is successful and becomes a popular draw amongst
moviegoers I wonder if this might propel a surge in historical interest. This result, while awesome to have realized, I
don’t want to get my hopes up for just yet. But, come on how cool would that
be!
With only a few days left until
this movie hits the silver screen there is plenty of uncertainty. I’m not sure
if Civil War buffs, like me, are as gitty with excitement as I am about this
movie. But, I am more excited about the potential that exists for this movie if
it proves to be a good history film, as it is looking to be right now. I can’t
wait to see the impact Lincoln could
have. In these trying times of the mass populace being disinterested in history,
I wonder if Lincoln can save us and bring our country together once again by
bridging the connection between the history field and our historically disenchanted
countrymen.
I'm interested to see how (or if) Spielberg, Lewis, and Kushner deal with the evolution of Lincoln's beliefs on race and slavery.
ReplyDeleteAlso, in my opinion, Spielberg always takes great care for historical accuracy in his films. Amistad, Schindler's List, Saving Private Ryan, and Munich are all good examples of his attention to historical details. Although no film can completely depict every aspect of an historical event, attention to details such as clothing, speech habits, and physical surroundings make all the difference -- and Lincoln will definitely have all these elements.